KPIs proposed for ASIC, APRA and AUSTRAC

compliance "financial reporting" "funds management"

25 May 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Australia's financial services regulators would be performance-managed and held to key performance indicators (KPIs) under measures being actively canvassed by key financial services organisations.

The measures are aimed at ensuring that financial services organisations being levied to pay for the regulators can actually determine whether they are getting value for money.

The measures are revealed in an Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) submission to the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) dealing with measuring that organisation's outcomes.

It comes at a time when the Government has moved to lift the level of financial services levies and indicated moves towards making the funding of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) fully user-pays.

It is also being proposed that any measurement of the performance of the regulators be undertaken by an independent third party agency, possibly the Australian National Audit Office.

What has been made clear in the submission is that the superannuation funds represented by ASFA want to be sure that they are getting value for money and that they want not only the performance of AUSTRAC measured, but also that of ASIC and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA).

"It was the strong view of our members that the industry needs to be involved in the design of the survey," the submission said. "It was also felt that the surveys should be used to benchmark the relative performance of each regulator (APRA, ASIC and AUSTRAC) and that the survey findings should be publicly reported."

"In addition, there was concern raised by ASFA members around the need to maintain the confidentiality of the organisations participating in the survey of the regulators' performance," the submission said. "In particular, our members felt that the surveys should be conducted by an independent third party. That is, the surveys should not be conducted by the relevant regulator or Treasury."

It said that one possible suggestion was for the Auditor General's Department to conduct the surveys.

 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Random

What happened to the 700,000 million of MLC if $1.2 Billion was migrated to Expand but Expand had only 512 Million in in...

1 day 12 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

The judge was quite undrstanding! THEN AASSIICC comes along and closes him down!All you 15600 people who work in the bu...

2 days 9 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

How could that underestimate happen?usually the quote transfer straight into the SOA, and what on earth has the commissi...

2 days 10 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 4 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 2 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 4 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND