Govt spotlight on borrowing in super

government/superannuation-funds/capital-gains-tax/superannuation-industry/income-tax/capital-gains/trustee/

11 March 2010
| By Caroline Munro |
image
image image
expand image

Government tax and consumer protection proposals made in recent days have put the spotlight on common industry practices around borrowing in super.

The Government has proposed changes to Corporations Regulations 2001 legislation to ensure that borrowing arrangements by superannuation fund trustees are considered financial products.

The proposal would see borrowing arrangements, such as instalment warrants, covered by the Government’s consumer protection framework.

“The measure will ensure that only licensed financial services providers offer these arrangements to superannuation funds,” said the Minister for Financial Services, Superannuation and Corporate Law, Chris Bowen.

He noted that the Government has also proposed an amendment to the tax law so that a superannuation trustee who enters into a limited recourse borrowing arrangement to purchase an asset, as permitted under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), would be treated as the owner of the asset for income tax purposes.

“The changes will ensure that trustees of superannuation funds who have entered into permitted limited recourse borrowing arrangements will not face CGT [Capital Gains Tax] obligations at the time the last instalments are paid,” Bowen said.

Interestingly, Bowen commented that the Government is aware of “some areas of uncertainty” with regards to borrowing arrangements made under the SIS Act.

Vince Scully of Blackwattle Capital pointed to the common practice of banks taking personal guarantees.

Under the SIS Act, in order for an instalment warrant to be considered as such and be included in the Government’s new ‘look-through’ approach, there must be “a non-recourse borrowing by the investor and no other guarantee from the investor (or associates) to the lender”.

Scully said while this is in place, common practice by the banks is to seek personal guarantees from investors.

“They won’t qualify for the correct tax treatment,” Scully said, referring to the proposed tax changes. He said it appears the Government is well aware of current practice and more questions are now being asked about concerns surrounding a possible gap in legislation.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 22 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo