Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Go beyond PI says Choice

professional-indemnity-insurance/professional-indemnity/insurance/australian-financial-services/financial-planners/financial-planning-association/financial-services-licence/financial-adviser/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/government/ASIC/chief-executive/

28 November 2007
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image image
expand image

Jo-Anne Bloch

Consumer advocacy group Choice is pushing both the Government and regulators to go further than professional indemnity insurance in terms of the obligations it wants imposed on financial planners and Australian Financial Services licence holders.

Choice wants the introduction of what it describes as a “compensation fund of last resort”, which it says is necessary to ensure that consumers who lose substantial sums are compensated.

Reacting to the release of a new regulatory guide by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission detailing compensation and insurance arrangements for AFS licensees, Choice spokesman Gordon Renouf said that even with the changes announced by the regulators, many consumers would face situations where their adviser had become insolvent and no insurance cover was available.

Further, he said that Choice was disappointed that licensees would not have to disclose the name of their professional indemnity insurer to consumers.

“Not knowing who the insurer is can delay or frustrate consumers’ efforts to obtain the compensation they are due where the financial adviser has gone out of business or absconded,” Renouf claimed.

For its part, the Financial Planning Association welcomed release of the ASIC regulatory guide with chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch saying it demonstrated an appreciation of the issues raised by the FPA and the complexities of the professional indemnity insurance market for financial planners.

She said the extension of the transition period over two years would greatly assist financial planners in sourcing appropriate professional indemnity cover.

Bloch said that ASIC’s decision to reduce professional indemnity cover requirements to equal company revenue would significantly reduce compliance costs while still providing adequate protection.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND