FSRA web wider than many think

property/financial-services-reform/funds-management/australian-financial-services/investments-commission/

15 August 2002
| By Barbara Messer |

TheAustralian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) licensing web will snare a growing number of unsuspecting professionals employed outside the realm of financial services, who may not be aware of their obligation to apply for an Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence.

Accountants, valuers, engineers, quantity surveyors and architects — indeed, anyone offering professional advice for inclusion in prospectuses for property trusts and syndicates — are all liable to feel ASIC’s regulatory gaze under the current terms of the Financial Services Reform Act (FSRA).

“Every day we are coming across organisations and individuals not involved in the formal business of funds raising or funds management, that are incredulous when they discover the Act may apply to them,” Teys McMahon Legal lawyer Greg McMahon says.

According to McMahon, property valuations appearing in prospectuses are a form of financial advice, and property valuers could thereby be required to hold an FSR licence, as could anyone who contributes their expertise to prospectuses.

“This is regulatory overkill, and people are reluctant to believe that the FSRA could apply to them,” McMahon says. “There are three options: many people won’t comply, some may outsource the licensing function, and others may try and get a licence, though this is a complex and expensive process,” he says.

Property developers and venture capitalists engaging in mezzanine funding or ‘excluded offers’, which raise funding from a limited number of investors, may also find themselves obliged to obtain FSRA licences if their fundraising activities are perceived by ASIC to be a form of funds management.

ASIC is already struggling to process licence applications from financial advisory industry participants, with only 71 applications being finalised since the FSRA came into effect in March 2002.

ASIC will need to start processing around 350 applications per month if it is to meet its two-year deadline, and now faces the additional task of licensing players outside the industry, McMahon says.

This is not a task that ASIC is necessarily happy to take on, but the commission has no legal basis on which to exclude outside players from the FSRA under its current terms, McMahon says

“ASIC needs to end the uncertainty and find a sensible resolution to confusion surrounding the FSRA,” he says.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 19 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo