FPA welcomes AFCA funding changes

FPA/AFCA/Sarah-Abood/costs/

11 March 2022
| By Liam Cormican |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Planning Association of Australia (FPA) has welcomed the announcement by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) about proposed changes to its funding model. 

FPA chief executive, Sarah Abood, said the new proposed model would significantly reduce the cost for FPA members in managing external complaints. 

“The FPA has been a strong advocate for simplifying the AFCA fee structure for financial planners and we welcome these proposed changes,” Abood said. 

“They will provide important cost relief to almost all of our members by simplifying and reducing the existing membership pricing and fees.” 

In its 2021 submission to the Treasury review of AFCA, the FPA questioned AFCA’s funding and fee structure, particularly when applied to small businesses and sole practitioners. 

It also outlined its concerns about firms incurring high fees and reputational damage from frivolous, vexatious and malicious complaints being allowed to progress through AFCA’s external dispute resolution (EDR) process on the request of the complainant rather than based on the merit of the complaint. 

“The proposed AFCA funding model will help address these issues in a number of ways,” Abood said. 

“The existing complex tiered annual membership pricing will be reduced to a flat $375. The complicated case fees model with 17 fee categories will be simplified into seven fee categories – and all at lower prices than currently charged. And importantly, AFCA will not charge member firms for the first five cases which go through their processes irrespective of which stage of the AFCA process the cases finish at.  

“In the financial planning and investment sector (which AFCA bundle together for reporting purposes), only 4% of firms go above five cases in a year and the FPA understands they are mainly in the investment area or impact very large advice licensees.  

“Therefore, members are very unlikely to pay more than the annual membership fee going forward in AFCA fees. This is a good outcome for FPA members.” 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

3 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

5 months ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

2 weeks 2 days ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

3 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

3 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND