FPA rebuts industry funds on best interest
The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has sought to strongly rebut industry fund suggestions that the Government’s proposed changes to the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) arrangements will compromise planners’ best interest obligations.
In a strongly-worded statement issued this evening, FPA chief executive Mark Rantall referred to the “rhetoric and unnecessary scare-mongering” which was clouding the facts about proposed amendments to the best interest duty.
He said Australian consumers had nothing to fear from the proposed changes and indicated that those who suggested otherwise were acting in a self-interested manner.
“We are witnessing an extraordinary effort by product providers and those who represent them to build a political position - based on flimsy arguments - in defence of a redundant section of FOFA pertaining to the best interests duty,” he said. “In this case the facts really do speak for themselves. Consumers have nothing to fear from the proposed amendments.”
The FPA has issued a statement regarding what it says are the facts about the best interests duty, particularly the fact that it is a statutory obligation and that the industry had pushed for the safe harbour steps.
Recommended for you
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
There is a gap in the market for Australian advisers to help individuals with succession planning as the country has been noted by Capital Group for being overly “hands off” around inheritances.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
Having peaked at more than 40 per cent growth since the first M&A bid, Insignia Financial shares have returned to earth six months later as the company awaits a final decision from CC Capital.
