Former WealthSure clients appeal damages split

17 March 2015
| By Jason |
image
image image
expand image

Two former WealthSure clients have returned to the High Court of Australia to argue against the apportioning of damages they were seeking in regards to losses sustained due to advice provided by former WealthSure adviser David Bertram.

The case returned to the High Court of Australia in Adelaide yesterday after a hearing in June last year ruled that the $1.7 million in damages being sought by the former clients — Ronald and Janna Selig — was to be apportioned between WealthSure, Bertram and a failed property development group Neovest Limited.

However the court also ruled the Seligs were partly responsible for their own losses and as such would only receive $1.45 million in damages while also being ordered to pay 30 per cent of the appeal costs of WealthSure and the other defendants who sought apportioning.

In appeal documents tended to the High Court legal representation for the Seligs have argued "the Corporations Act provides, upon its natural reading, that loss consequent upon misleading advice from a licensed financial services provider is to be recovered without apportionment".

Paul Heywood-Smith QC, acting for the Seligs, stated in the documents that there were conflicting decisions in other cases from differently constituted appellate courts but that under the Corporations Act that "once a cause of action is established which is nonapportionable the claim is not apportionable even though the facts might give rise to a separate claim that is an apportionable claim".

As such the Seligs are seeking the full damages payment of $1.7 million, interest on that amount from April 2013 when damages were awarded, and payment of costs by WealthSure, Bertram, Neovest, Norton Capital and QBE — WealthSure's professional indemnity insurer.

The case has yet to conclude with the High Court reserving its decision till a later date.

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

2 weeks 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month 1 week ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 2 weeks ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

1 week 1 day ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo