Exiting planning because it’s just unattractive
Sometimes people just exit the financial planning arena because the underlying regulatory environment and other factors become too problematic.
And that is what broadly resulted in the departure of two firms run by Certified Practice Accountants last year, prompting a dealer group head to caution that a number of factors are serving to reduce the attractiveness of financial planning as a business and career option.
Premium Wealth Management chief executive Paul Harding-Davis said he was aware of two businesses run by CPAs which had decided to exit planning last year mostly because they believed it had become an unappealing and difficult business proposition.
He said that while, on the surface at least, the firms had left for reasons such as one owner accepting an offer for the business while the principals of another opted to largely drop planning to focus on finance and property, the reality in each of the cases was that the business principals had made an assessment of the challenges and complexities confronting them in the financial planning space and had opted to exit.
"I know there are many people still highly attracted to financial planning, but I don't think we can afford to ignore the reasons why people are choosing to exit," Harding-Davis said.
He said one of the most unfortunate facts was that all of the players who had chosen to depart the planning sector involved quality people with considerable talents and expertise.
Recommended for you
As private markets garner mainstream attention, a panel of experts believe access to the asset class through managed accounts will become more widely available, providing opportunities for advisers to diversify portfolios.
While retail investors turned to blue-chip stocks last month, according to AUSIEX trading data, September saw advised investors switch into ETFs.
With the intergenerational wealth transfer underway in Australia, wealth managers are focusing on how they can attract the next generation of advisers to service these younger clients.
ASIC wants to expand proceedings against Equity Trustees to seek compensation for members following Macquarie’s agreement to pay $321 million over Shield failings.
