ESG imbalance between client and adviser
There is an imbalance between advisers and clients over who brings up the topic of environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing.
Speaking to Money Management, Dave Rae, adviser at Federation Financial and a member of the Responsible Investment Association of Australasia (RIAA) certification panel, said advisers should not use ESG only if the client demanded it.
He said: “According to the RIAA, 86% of Australians expect the adviser to ask them about ESG. It is not the case that the client will necessarily raise the issue, they are waiting for the adviser to bring it up.
“There was a reluctance from advisers in the past because they didn’t have enough knowledge about it but now clients expect it.”
The RIAA research also found 90% of consumers felt it was important their advisers provided responsible or ethical options and 87% felt comfortable discussing their values with their adviser.
However, this contradicted research by Research Affiliates that advisers’ use of ESG strategies was driven by client demand. In its global report, it found client demand was the primary motivation for 63% of advisers who used ESG strategies.
The study also found advisers lacked a written policy on ESG and preferred to discuss it face-to-face.
Rae said: “That doesn’t surprise me, ESG is not an area where advisers have done well and a structured approach would be valuable so they know what they are going to bring up with clients and have a clear policy on it”.
A written policy would also help to ensure that advisers went through the same ESG process with each client rather than waiting to hear their preferences.
He also said clients were seeking more quantitative data on how their investment was contributing in a positive way, which could be difficult to provide as there wasn’t a standardised approach to reporting.
“Integrity of data is a problem, you won’t ever get 100% accurate reporting. The non-financial metrics are a good starting point and they will improve over time thanks to regulation coming out of the European Union,” Rae said.
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
As the industry navigates the fallout from recent product failures, two major AFSLs have detailed their APL selection process and relationship with research houses, warning a selection error could “destroy” a licensee.
The impending retirement of financial advisers in their 50s could see the profession face significant succession challenges over the coming decade and younger advisers may not be the answer.
With a third of AFSLs being solo advisers, how can they navigate key person risk and ensure they are still attractive propositions for buyers when it comes to their succession planning?
A quarter of advisers who commenced on the FAR within the last two years have already switched licensees or practices, adding validity to practice owners’ professional year (PY) concerns.
