Democrats out of the blocks with super

commissions/compliance/superannuation-fund/superannuation-industry/superannuation-funds/australian-prudential-regulation-authority/financial-advisers/best-interests/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/government/

2 September 2004
| By Mike Taylor |

The Australian Democrats have moved quickly to outline elements of their superannuation policy ahead of next month’s Federal election by announcing a five point plan which they say will ensure consumers pay low fees and charges.

At the same time, the Democrats are refusing to rule out banning commissions on compulsory superannuation guarantee contributions if it is shown financial advisers are not acting in the best interests of their clients.

Integral to the Democrats proposal is close monitoring of superannuation fees and charges by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.

Democrats spokesman on Superannuation Senator John Cherry says as part of the Democrats negotiations with the Government to provide employees with choice of superannuation fund, the Government committed that the regulatory watchdogs will monitor and report on super fees and charges for at least the next five years.

Senator Cherry pointed to the fact that, since then, some the larger financial institutions had announced a reduction in their fees.

He says the Democrats will:

* lobby for ASIC to develop a five star rating for superannuation and investment products based on their level of fees. A one-star rating could be a high fee product, a five-star could be given to an extremely low fee product;

* ensure that monitoring and reporting of super fees and changes is comprehensive;

* push for the comprehensive benchmarking of fees and charges across the various superannuation products and investment choices;

* monitor the impact of choice on the superannuation industry. They do not rule out the banning of commissions on compulsory Superannuation Guarantee contributions if it is shown that the financial advisers are not acting in the best interests of their clients; and

* push for a Government review of the administration and compliance costs incurred by superannuation funds. We will be critical of any unnecessary burdens on the industry such as further excessive 'safety' or prudential requirements.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 10 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo