Default system entrenching regulator and union power

12 September 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The current default superannuation system has entrenched disengagement and given more fund selection responsibility to regulators, employers and unions, according to big banking group, ANZ.

The banking group has used its submission to the Productivity Commission (PC) inquiry into superannuation efficiency and competitiveness to argue for a range of changes, including a lifetime superannuation identifier similar to a tax-file number.

However, the essence of the ANZ submission is that the very mechanisms which successive Governments have imposed to supposedly protect individuals may actually be achieving the opposite by “entrenching disengagement, by giving more responsibility to regulators and employers/unions in choosing funds”.

“The system tacitly implies 'it's ok not to worry about your superannuation,” the submission said claiming that it was also “unwittingly creating rigidity as when employees change jobs, they can move into a second or even third default account, causing a proliferation of super accounts, fees and insurance”.

“Employees shouldn't have multiple accounts by default,” the ANZ submission said.

It claimed the superannuation system had been unresponsive to changes in the workplace (e.g. more frequent job changes, gig economy) and in demography (i.e. catering for different generations), which exacerbates the effects of disengagement and rigidity.

The submission said that, as a result, two-thirds of members remained with their default fund despite the fact a default product provided the minimum services necessary to provide income in retirement.

“A system that is based around default allocations will only be optimal for an individual’s circumstances by accident,” it said. “In principle, individuals – with appropriate education and/or advice – should be able to improve their retirement income outcomes by choosing an alternative to the default option that better suits their individual circumstances.”

“Australia’s current mandatory and default superannuation system risks perpetuating issues around member apathy and disengagement, in addition to missing out on opportunities from fostering more choice and competition,” the ANZ submission said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

JOHN GILLIES

Might be a bit different to i the past where at most there was one man from the industry on the loaded enquiry boards a...

1 day 4 hours ago
Simon

Who get's the $10M? Where does the money go?? Might it end up in the CSLR to financially assist duped investors??? ...

5 days 23 hours ago
Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 6 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND