Corporate culture inconsistent with actual behaviour
Financial services firms are still lagging in correcting their corporate culture with a clash between public statements of accountability and the internal actions of staff and executives.
Furthermore firms are still considering not whether an ethical dilemma is right or wrong but whether they can get away with not dealing with it appropriately, according to the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority chair Wayne Byres.
Speaking at the Symposium on Asian Banking and Finance in Singapore on Friday, Byres said there was still room for serious improvement in the areas of governance, culture and remuneration.
He stated that while culture was a 'nebulous concept' APRA regularly saw groups failing to ask whether behaviour was right and "instead, the question has often been 'can I get away with this?'".
"More ominously, in some cases it appears no question was asked because the attitude was 'if you ain't cheating, you ain't trying'. For an industry that is ultimately founded on trust, something serious is amiss, and strong and ethical leadership within financial firms is needed to set this right."
Byres criticised the financial incentives given to some individuals in financial services and said these were a truer indication of what an organisation truly values and were often at odds with wider statements released by the organisations which employ the individuals.
"It is clear that, in many cases, aspirational statements of organisational culture have been no match for the personal incentives that are created for individuals," Byres said.
"Much of the post-crisis reform agenda has been aimed at getting the organisational interests of financial firms more aligned with those of the wider community. Getting personal incentives correspondingly aligned with organisational interests needs to be seen as equally important."
AUTHOR
Jason Spits
Recommended for you
The month of April enjoyed four back-to-back weeks of growth in financial adviser numbers, with this past week seeing a net rise of five.
ASIC has permanently banned a former Perth adviser after he made “materially misleading” statements to induce investors.
The Financial Services and Credit Panel has made a written order to a relevant provider after it gave advice regarding non-concessional contributions.
With the election taking place on Saturday (3 May), Adviser Ratings examines how the two major parties could shape the advice industry in the future.
