Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Consumers don’t understand 'independent advice' label

corporations-act/australian-financial-services/financial-advice/investments-commission/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/

28 August 2014
| By Jason |
image
image image
expand image

Financial advice consumers are unlikely to understand the criteria for advisers labelling themselves ‘independent' with calls to distinguish between independent and aligned advisers unlikely to clarify that or adequately manage conflicts of interest according to KPMG.

Rather emphasis should be given to managing conflicts under current law with obligations to do so equally applied to independent and aligned advisers

The large scale accounting business made the comments as part of its second round submission to the Financial System Inquiry stating that it was "unlikely that many consumers understand the criteria for using the restricted words ‘independent, impartial and unbiased'" as they are defined within the section 923A of the Corporations Act.

KPMG also stated that it was unlikely that consumers understood what these terms indicated about the way an adviser is remunerated and their relationship with product issuers.

The submission cited research conducted by the UK Financial Services Authority and published in November 2011 after the implementation of its Retail Distribution Review which found that around 40 per cent of survey respondents could not tell if their adviser was independent or how that effected the ability to provide product advice from single or multiple providers.

KPMG stated that more emphasis should be placed on the adequate management of conflicts of interest which currently exist under general obligations for Australian Financial Services licensees and specifically under the best interest duties and conflicts priority rules within the Corporations Act.

The comments run counter to those of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission which has called for institutionally aligned advisers to be labelled as restricted advice providers.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

1 day 22 hours ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND