Concerns over PI 'distortions'

financial planners australian securities and investments commission professional indemnity insurance professional indemnity senator mathias cormann australian financial services financial planning insurance ASIC FOFA asset allocation corporations act money management

21 January 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The rules being applied by professional indemnity (PI) insurers may be having more impact on the asset allocations being recommended by financial planners than approved product lists or other factors.

That is the analysis of a number of planners who are concerned that the limited number of companies prepared to offer PI, and the conditions they are imposing on the provision of that insurance, risk some planners not being able to act in client's best interests.

It is understood concern about the manner in which the rules being imposed by PI insurers is impacting on asset allocation has been referred to the Shadow Assistant Treasurer, Senator Mathias Cormann.

Financial planners are required to hold professional indemnity insurance under section 912B of the Corporations Act, which is then reflected in Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) regulatory guide RG 126.

The objective of the legislation and the regulatory approach is for Australian Financial Services licensees to have arrangements for compensating retail clients for losses they suffer as a result of a breach by the licensee or its representatives.

However a number of planners have told Money Management that the approach being taken by the PI insurers themselves, such as limiting exposures to property trusts to 10 per cent of total investments handled by an adviser, does not sit well with the best interests duty under the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) changes.

They said they were concerned that planners also risked falling foul of the regulatory requirements by inadvertently exceeding the so-called "book ratios" imposed by the PI companies.

There was a risk that planners would be tempted to advise their clients to move into safer, but lesser-performing products simply to meet their PI asset ratio targets.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Big Feller

This can't be a surprising development. I'm sure every Financial Planner in Australia has had an experience of being sc...

19 hours 53 minutes ago
One foot out the door

Just 15 per cent of advisers said they may exit the industry over the next few years, Thats about 2,300 advisers! if ...

1 day ago
Craig Offenhauser

I think Mr. Toohey's conclusions and extrapolations are "currently" merging on the typical SMSF issue of "....prone to ...

3 days 19 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 2 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND