Concerns expressed over relevance of bodies on adviser register

ASIC/financial-planning/

20 April 2015
| By Jason |
image
image image
expand image

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has expressed concerns regarding the professional associations listed on the Financial Advisers Register (FAR) questioning how some of them are relevant to the provision of financial planning advice.

The comments, by FPA General Manager Policy and Conduct Dante De Gori, follow the addition of 16 professional associations and bodies to the FAR administered by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

Of the 16 bodies named six were related to financial planning, three to accountancy, two to superannuation funds and trustees and one to stock broking, general insurance broking, managed account providers, investment analysts and the provision of education.

"Many of these bodies do not have individual advisers providing financial advice and while the adviser register is a positive thing as it is open and transparent, what does it say to consumers with this list? How useful is the membership of some of these bodies to the provision of financial advice?," De Gori said.

De Gori said the inclusion of professional association memberships and education qualifications does not, at present, restrict the use of the term ‘financial planner' as ASIC had yet to adopt any recommendations from the PJC Inquiry into Standards of Advice.

That inquiry recommended linking inclusion on the register only to advisers who also had membership of a professional body which had adopted professional standards accredited by a third party statutory body — the Professional Standards Council. In doing so it would restrict the term ‘financial planner' without the need for enshrinement under law.

However De Gori said that while the FAR has not proceeded down that route it may still do so after the consultation on the PJC's final report ends in June and that "enshrinement via the register was not dead and was very much still in play depending on what announcement were made at the time".

"The current form of the adviser register is a response to Federal Government plans announced last year with ASIC not asked to act on the PJC recommendations, however if they are endorsed by the government it is likely the register will be amended to suit."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months 1 week ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

2 weeks ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

3 weeks 3 days ago

ASIC has confirmed the industry funding levy for the 2024–25 financial year, and how much licensees can expect to pay....

4 days 9 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
5