Complaint recording costs to be borne by members: ASFA

ASFA/superannuation-funds/superannuation-fund-members/investments-commission/super-funds/association-of-superannuation-funds/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/

7 November 2008
| By Lucinda Beaman |

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has warned that the adoption of a new definition of the term ‘complaint’ included in current dispute resolution consultation papers will lead to increased costs for super funds, which will ultimately be borne by members.

ASFA has submitted its response to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC’s) Consultation Paper 102 Dispute Resolution — Review of RG 139 and RG 165. ASFA’s feedback related to the adoption of a new definition of ‘complaint’ in the Australian standard on complaints handling.

The ASIC paper proposes a requirement for every complaint to be recorded, which ASFA said has “significant workload and cost implications for funds”.

ASFA said while the new standard “may add a layer of consistency to how complaints are treated, it has the consequence of creating a large additional workload for superannuation funds”.

ASFA said ultimately, superannuation fund members would bear the cost of this additional workload.

The requirement would be for funds to record data relating to every complaint, even where the complaint has been resolved. This would stretch to enquiries for members missing a periodic statement or wishing to express dissatisfaction over returns, for example.

ASFA said while an effective complaints handling mechanism is part of a super fund’s responsibility to act in the best interests of members, “it needs to be appreciated that a number of superannuation funds do not currently record and track all complaints in the manner alluded to by the new definition”.

“ASFA understands that some enquiries do turn into complaints at a later time and some seemingly resolved issues do come back. However, it is unreasonable to expect that all enquiries are logged individually just in case they turn into complaints.”

But ASFA said it nevertheless “appreciates the policy objective of identifying and responding to complaints quickly and effectively, as this improves both member satisfaction and provides superannuation funds with useful data to improve its overall operations”.

ASFA’s recommendation is for ASIC to make a clear statement as to its expectations for complaints record keeping and that it work with ASFA in determining a ‘pragmatic’ approach to implementing the new standard.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 10 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo