Clarity required on reportable situations about other licensees

breach/breach-reporting/BT/principals-community/

28 September 2022
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

Breach reporting issues regarding reportable situations about other licensees goes beyond the provision of poor advice and advisers may be unaware of the potential issues.

On a BT podcast, Brian Pollock, director of corporate governance at the Principals Community, which was an advisory council for self-licensed advisers, outlined some areas where he had encountered advisers with breach reporting issues.

He said: “The most controversial [issue] I think is reportable situations about other licensees and their financial advisers in relation to personal advice to retail clients.

“This is certainly an area that has traded a fair degree of discussion and confusion. For me, it clearly goes beyond the provision of poor financial advice, which is typically what advisers are focusing on when they think about reporting other advisers.

“This can go so far as to matters where an external adviser refuses to turn off the ongoing advice fees when a client terminates the ongoing fee arrangement and such action would be reportable against that adviser and that licensee.”

When it came to the common breaches that Pollock encountered, he said ongoing advice fees made up around two-thirds of the breaches reported.

“There’s a range of reason for this, it could be the adviser had the conversation with the client and then forgot to create a workflow task to up the fees because it’s a manual process. Or they hand it over to their admin manager who forgets to process it.

“Or two of the three funds are turned off and a third is missed. Or it could be the fee consent forms have all been turned back but they forgot to provide their renewal notice so the agreement terminates because they haven’t renewed it. So there are lots of different reasons for this manual process to fall over.”

He said he would like to see regulatory relief applied to these type of cases as they were often simple mistakes where the client was quickly remediated but the cost of manage the breach process far exceeded the remediation cost.

“For such immaterial matters, it would be good to see some common sense being applied.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 4 weeks ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

1 week 5 days ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

2 weeks 3 days ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND