Challenges possible on binding nominations
From later this year, superannuation fund members will be able to challenge binding death nominations nationally in the Supreme Courts.
New South Wales has passed legislation that enables the nominations to be challenged, but a Commonwealth uniform succession act will be passed, possibly this year, to enable this to occur in all states.
Bartier Perry executive lawyer Chris Tsovolos said actions by the deceased fund member prior to death can be challenged.
“If the member did something within three years prior to their death, any nomination including that action can be challenged by another member or the estate,” he said.
“If successful, the benefit can be clawed back into the estate.”
It will mean members could have less say on where they want an asset to go on death, Tsovolos told the Kaplan Financial Adviser Roadshow in Melbourne.
“It can restrict the member’s ability to make a direction on where an asset will go, such as a business property going to a child working in the family business,” he said.
“It does mean a fund member is going to have less control because somebody else can have a say on their nomination.”
Another change to estate planning involving superannuation concerns the definition of a dependent relationship.
“Under the [Income Tax Assessment Act 1997] two persons, neither related by family, can have an interdependency relationship if they have a close personal relationship,” Tsovolos said.
“If they don’t meet these requirements, they can still satisfy the requirements by either suffering from a physical, intellectual or psychiatric impairment.” He said the two dependent parties don’t have to live together, so cases where a husband is in a home and dies will still enable the wife living in the family home to challenge a nomination.
It will also encompass same-sex relationships and separated marriages.
Tsovolos said ensuring trust deeds are amended to incorporate all the latest changes in law are important, as this document sets the operating rules for the fund.
“Superannuation funds in Australia operate as trusts, so the deed will say what can and can’t be done,” he said.
“So introducing borrowing into a superannuation fund cannot be undertaken unless the deed allows it.”
Recommended for you
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
There is a gap in the market for Australian advisers to help individuals with succession planning as the country has been noted by Capital Group for being overly “hands off” around inheritances.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
Having peaked at more than 40 per cent growth since the first M&A bid, Insignia Financial shares have returned to earth six months later as the company awaits a final decision from CC Capital.
