CBA recommends ASIC perform risk-analysis on AFSL models

australian-financial-services/storm-financial/parliamentary-joint-committee/dealer-group/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/

6 August 2009
| By Lucinda Beaman |

The Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) has made recommendations to a parliamentary inquiry that Australian Financial Services Licensees be required to periodically report to the regulator on key aspects of their businesses, a move the bank believes will help identify risky planning businesses at an earlier stage.

CBA owns one of Australia’s largest financial planning dealer groups, and has also acknowledged its role in the financial damage incurred by clients of another dealer group, Storm Financial.

The bank made the recommendation in its submission to the parliamentary joint committee inquiry into financial services and products, which was established earlier this year partly in response to the actions of the bank and the now collapsed dealer group Storm Financial.

CBA has pointed to possible ways in which the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) could identify failing financial advice businesses at an earlier stage.

In its submission, CBA proposed that Australian Financial Services Licensees be required to report periodically to ASIC on a range of issues relating to their business model. This could include the group’s list of approved investment products, the products most frequently recommended, the number of authorised representatives in the group and the number of Statements of Advice produced, among other matters.

The bank argued that this information would, among other benefits, make it simpler for ASIC to identify and investigate advice businesses considered to be risk ‘outliers’ among their peers, and those with the greatest potential for failure.

However, given that margin lending has been a popular strategy across the industry in recent years, and the fact that, at the time of its collapse, the majority of Storm’s clients were yet to be converted to the highly geared ‘Storm model’, it is unlikely the regulator would have had reason to consider the group an ‘outlier’.

The CBA submission said the bank does not believe the Storm Financial disaster represents a “systemic failure of the financial planning industry”, and, as such, it does not believe the “existing financial advice framework requires wholesale legislative change”.

The bank argued that “where there is reasonable application of the current advice framework, poor client outcomes will be rare”.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

4 days 12 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo