BFP backs FPA on separating products from advice

ASIC/compliance/financial-planning/FOFA/super-funds/FPA/financial-services-industry/financial-planning-association/financial-advice/financial-planner/

10 June 2014
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

A structural flaw had allowed financial product manufacturers (banks, insurers and super funds) to "dress up" the provision of information regarding their products, and the selling of their products by employees, agents, or representatives of their licensees, as "advice", according to the Boutique Financial Planning Principals Group (BFP).

The BFP has made the claim at the same time as backing the Financial Planning Association's (FPA's) Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) 10 point plan and particularly the separation of product sales from advice.

The BFP executive, meeting on Friday, said it fully endorsed the 10 point plan, with its president, Wayne Roggero saying the organisation believed the plan not only contained the steps necessary to move forward as a profession but also to provide protection for Austrlaian consumers.

He said the BFP always believed that the FSR regime contained a structural flaw in allowing financial product manufacturers (banks, insurers and super funds) to "dress up" the provision of information regarding their products, and the selling of their products by employees, agents, or representatives of their licensees, as "advice".

"These financial institutions have continually used this "advice" as a "loss leader" to direct funds to, or retain funds in, their own financial products or platforms," Roggero said.

He said there had been numerous surveys released in recent years highlighting that consumers receiving advice through AFSLs owned by product manufacturers mistakenly thought they were dealing with "independent" advisers and the BFP had repeatedly called for clearer disclosure of the ultimate owner of an AFSL to allow consumers to make an informed choice.

Roggero said the BFP also supported the call for the introduction of an ASIC register for all Financial Planners which it believed would allow Licensees to be able to confirm the employment history of a Financial Planner, something which was currently difficult where a planner had been an employee representative.

He said that while the BFP maintained the FOFA reforms included important consumer protection measures, these had been overwhelmed by poor drafting and unnecessary regulation, and they failed to address the structural flaws in the financial services industry.

"As such, FOFA remains a work-in-progress requiring immediate remedial attention to reduce red tape, so that our members can continue to provide cost-effective advice to Australian consumers and small businesses," Roggero said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 4 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo