Be careful what you switch for: FPA
Switching for switching’s sake in the new choice of funds environment has been discouraged by the Financial Planning Association (FPA), which claimed last week that in the majority of cases there is nothing wrong with most peoples’ existing super funds.
The comments came from the chair of the FPA’s superannuation committee, Louise Biti, who also predicted that few people would change funds when choice was introduced.
Nevertheless, Biti expressed fear that because of recent media attention surrounding the issue, some members would almost feel obligated to change funds as soon as choice was introduced and could end up losing insurance cover or incurring higher fees.
Biti, whose comments come amidst intense scrutiny by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission of advisers who recommend clients switch funds, said consumers should not base important decisions on what they were told in commercials or “conversations at work around the water cooler”.
“It is only if they have researched the various options thoroughly and found that their fund does not compare well with other funds that are available, or does not meet their specific needs, that change should be considered,” she said.
Recommended for you
ASIC has permanently banned a former Perth adviser after he made “materially misleading” statements to induce investors.
The Financial Services and Credit Panel has made a written order to a relevant provider after it gave advice regarding non-concessional contributions.
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
