Banks told to cover all their problems

australian-prudential-regulation-authority/compliance/APRA/financial-markets/macquarie-bank/risk-management/government/chairman/

19 August 2014
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Australia's big four banks along with AMP Limited, Suncorp, Macquarie Bank and Challenger have been warned by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) that their conglomerate status will now allow them the luxury of avoiding losses incurred by separate elements of their operations.

The regulator has told the big eight conglomerates that the markets will expect them to cover "losses sustained by group members, even if the affected members are operationally separated or separable".

The point has been made in draft guidance issued by APRA which the regulator has said it will not move to make effective until after the Government proceeds on the basis of the Financial Systems Inquiry (FSI).

However the draft guidance makes clear that the regulator is looking for a group-wide approach.

Commenting on the draft guidance, APRA chairman, Wayne Byres made the point that the eight conglomerate groups to which APRA intended applying the planned "Level 3 framework" controlled approximately 80 per cent of the assets of all APRA-regulated institutions.

"The importance of strong group-wide governance, risk management and capital adequacy is therefore critical not just to these groups, but to the stability of the financial system more broadly," he said.

The draft guidance document states from the outset that, "Level 3 groups must develop and maintain group-wide policies that establish consistent business practices for governance, fitness and propriety of key staff, business continuity management and outsourcing".

"APRA's cross-industry behavioural prudential standards on these aspects of corporate governance are required to be applied across Level 3 groups, including to non-APRA-regulated institutions engaging in business activities that may have a material financial or operational impact on the group," it said.

Elsewhere in its draft guidance, APRA said it remained of the view that groups containing systemically important banks "cannot restructure to address contagion risk arising from the group's non-APRA-regulated institutions".

"APRA considers that there is a serious risk that financial markets will expect an Authorised Deposit-taking Institution (ADI) that dominates its group to cover losses sustained by group members, even if the affected members are operationally separated or separable from the ADI," it said.

"If this market expectation is not met, markets could form the view that the ADI is unable rather than unwilling to cover these losses. This loss in market confidence could adversely affect the ADI's liquidity position and, ultimately, its viability."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 21 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo