Associations march on Canberra
Pressureis mounting on the Federal Government to amend elements of the Financial Services Reform Act (FSRA) following the unprecedented pooling of industry lobbying power.
Five of the industry’s key financial advisory associations have thrown their weight behind approaching Government, arguing for it to amend the laws relating to statements of advice (SOA).
The matter was initially reported byMoney Managementback in August after revealing the Boutique Financial Planning Principals Group (BFPPG) had approached Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer Ian Campbell to amend the Act.
At the time, the BFPPG claimed the law favoured “large product distribution shops producing non-tailored, press-the-button advice” at the expense of small dealer and planning groups.
Since then, the BFPPG has enlisted the support of the other major industry associations - theFinancial Planning Association, the Financial Planners Federation of Australia, the Association of Independently Owned Financial Planners andCPA Australia.
“It takes people time to fully understand all the implications of the law, and that’s why it’s only now that there’s a growing awareness of the problems that are there,” BFPPG president Bruce Baker says.
Baker says in its existing form the Act exposes planners to criminal and civil liability in situations where they may not be at fault.
According to Baker, under existing law it is too easy to find an SOA technically defective, opening the adviser up to legal action.
“Even planners who are behaving ethically, honestly and are providing good advice can be thrown in jail or fined from a criminal offence angle,” Baker says.
However, Baker says planners should be more concerned with the civil liability issues arising from the legislation, as theAustralian Securities and Investments Commissionis less likely to use the Act in relation to finding planners criminally liable.
“Any time that the market takes a downturn, even when good advice is provided, we’re going to see a flood of law suits from vexatious clients,” Baker says.
Recommended for you
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
There is a gap in the market for Australian advisers to help individuals with succession planning as the country has been noted by Capital Group for being overly “hands off” around inheritances.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
Having peaked at more than 40 per cent growth since the first M&A bid, Insignia Financial shares have returned to earth six months later as the company awaits a final decision from CC Capital.
