Assirt gives three stars to Zurich funds

compliance/fixed-interest/Zurich/international-equities/chief-executive/

5 February 2002
| By Kate Kachor |

Zurich Financial Services(ZFS) new range of multi-manager products has received a less than sterling debut rating fromAssirt, and despite some strengths, has been awarded a competent grade and a three star ranking.

The first-time rating of ZFS comes a few months after the group launched its new product range late last year, according to Assirt research analyst Jody Fitzgerald.

Fitzgerald says ZFS has been rated as the group is preparing to get its new multi-manager, style neutral product range to market.

Assirt chief executive Krystyna Weston praised ZFS’s investment structure saying, the group offers investors an exposure to some of the industry’s more highly regarded managers through the one product which would be attractive to the broader investment community.

The Assirt report also rated ZFS’s business management and the group’s compliance and customer service capabilities as strong.

ZFS’s multi manager capabilities were also praised by Assirt, with the report stating that the manager’s selection process involves an appropriate combination of quantitative and qualitative assessment.

Its underlying managers are chosen based on process, performance and their complementarity to the investment style of Zurich Scudder. ZFS treats Zurich Scudder with the same level of scrutiny as the external managers and therefore can be terminated for process or performance issues.

However, despite giving the group’s capabilities the green light, Assirt says while the initial work undertaken was adequate, it is concerned with the level of ongoing style monitoring of the combined portfolio.

Assirt is also concerned with ZFS’s appointment of an external asset consultant to assist the group in the manager selection process. The research house says it is concerned with Zurich’s ability to quickly implement appropriate changes to the manager line up given the level of information supplied and the frequency of the reviews.

The other drawback for ZFS in the report was that each of its investment sectors - Australian equities, international Equities, diversified fixed interest and listed property - were assessed as having only competent capabilities.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 23 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo