ASIC’s penalty structure lags globally
Australia’s corporate regulator is severely limited in the range and severity of penalties it can hand out for wrongdoing - particularly compared to the US and UK, a review has concluded.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) could be letting the public down due to its restrictions on prison terms and fines, the regulator’s first penalty structure review in more than a decade has concluded.
US regulators are able to dole out significantly longer prison terms for similar crimes, the review found, with sentences of up to 20 years for insider trading, market manipulation and fraud.
In Australia, ASIC can inflict maximum prison terms of up to 10 years, which places it on a par with Canada and Hong Kong.
However, when it came to individual fines, penalties for crimes like disclosure and unlicensed conduct are capped at $34,000, compared with more than $5 million for Canada and the US, or unlimited in the UK.
Unlike its global counterparts, ASIC also does not have a disgorgement penalty at its disposal, which would force wrongdoers to pay back penalties earned dishonestly.
Commenting on the review, ASIC chairman Greg Medcraft said: “The public expects ASIC to take strong action against serious corporate wrongdoers. Those who break the law and cause severe damage should face tough penalties”.
The findings from the REP 387 review will be presented to the Financial System Inquiry.
Recommended for you
The central bank has released its decision on the official cash rate following its November monetary policy meeting.
Melbourne advice firm Hewison Private Wealth has marked four decades of service after making its start in 1985 as a “truly independent advice business” in a largely product-led market.
HLB Mann Judd Perth has announced its acquisition of a WA business advisory firm, growing its presence in the region, along with 10 appointments across the firm’s national network.
Unregistered managed investment scheme operator Chris Marco has been sentenced after being found guilty of 43 fraud charges, receiving the highest sentence imposed by an Australian court regarding an ASIC criminal investigation.
