ASIC’s damning assessment of CFP’s former culture

24 June 2013
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

Conflicts of interest, arising from commission-based payments, were at the heart of the problems with Commonwealth Financial Planning (CFP), according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

Further, ASIC deputy chairman Peter Kell has told the Parliamentary Joint Committee which will be reviewing ASIC's performance with respect to CFP and other financial services organisations, that implementation of the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) changes will go some way towards addressing those issues.

He said the media had been right to shine a light on the conduct five years ago of CFP "because it reminds the public how far we have come in changing financial planning".

"There was unacceptable and unlawful conduct at CFP. Clients were given inappropriate advice and many suffered badly because of it.

"And that is exactly why ASIC took serious enforcement action. Our actions:

* had seven advisers banned;

* set up a compensation system that will result in 1127 customers receiving around $50 million. There are around 37 cases yet to be resolved; and

* forced CFP into an enforceable undertaking that required the group to change completely the way it does business."

Kell said CFP had been a complex matter and "cases like this involve much background work before a public result is achieved. That is how law enforcement works. ASIC has to also carefully assess information presented to us and make judgments about what would stand up in court".

"On the topic of whistleblowers, we cannot and will not discuss whistleblower involvement in any particular case," he said. "If ASIC revealed these details it would compromise the integrity of our whistleblower policy and deter people coming forward," Kell said.

"What person would approach ASIC if they suspected we might discuss their case with a newspaper reporter? In fact, we go out of our way to protect whistleblowers and several years ago successfully fought a case in the Federal Court to conceal someone's identity."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Ralph

How did the licensee not check this - they should be held to task over it. Obviously they are not making sure their sta...

2 days 8 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Faking exams and falsifying results..... Too stupid to comment on JG...

2 days 9 hours ago
PETER JOHNSTON- AIOFP

Must agree to disagree with you on this one Keith, with the Banks/Institutions largely out of advice now is the time to ...

2 days 9 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 3 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND