ASIC updates mortgage scheme guidance

ASIC/retail-investors/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/global-financial-crisis/

10 May 2012
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has updated the guidance around investing in mortgage schemes which it said aims to improve risk awareness of these products by increasing disclosure requirements.

Revised disclosure benchmarks and separate disclosure principles for unlisted mortgage schemes are contained in updated Regulatory Guide 45 Mortgage schemes: improving disclosure for retail investors (RG45) and also outlined in an accompanying investor guide.

Since the original RG45 was published, the sector experienced a large scale redemption freeze when the global financial crisis caused a liquidity squeeze.

ASIC has since formally consulted with industry on extending and strengthening existing regulatory guidance on disclosure for unlisted mortgage schemes in RG 45.

ASIC said it also modified the law to facilitate partial investor access to funds in cases of hardship, and to simplify the procedures for periodic withdrawal offers out of available cash. 

ASIC Commissioner Greg Tanzer said ensuring investors are fully informed is especially important when considering risky investments like unlisted mortgage funds.

"People need to understand the risks, particularly in relation to asset liquidity and withdrawal arrangements. It is important that investors understand that the assets of these schemes are less liquid than other investments, and this affects any rights they have to get their money back," he said.

Responsible entities of existing unlisted mortgage schemes should disclose the benchmark and updated disclosure principle information to investors and include the information in new product disclosure statements by 1 January 2013, ASIC stated.

The changes to RG45 include revised benchmarks which focus on the key characteristics of the business models of unlisted mortgage schemes and associated risks, additional information requirements under separate disclosure principles to ensure that key risks are disclosed, and guidance on how ASIC expects feeder funds to address the benchmarks and disclosure principles at the feeder fund level.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 3 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 4 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

3 weeks 6 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

2 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser who gave inappropriate advice to his clients including false and misleading Statements of Advice....

1 week 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo