ASIC seeks to restrain Tyson Scholz from promoting financial services
The corporate regulator is seeking restraining orders on Tyson Scholz from carrying or promoting any financial services business in Australia.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) filed proceedings in the Federal Court as it suspected Scholz carried on a financial services business without holding an Australian financial services licence.
ASIC said Scholz delivered training courses and seminars about trading in securities on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) and promoted them on Twitter and Instagram using the handle @ASXWOLF_TS.
Scholz resided in Queensland and was a director of BW Asset Management and EWOLF Enterprises.
Scholz’s business to paying subscribers included:
- Subscription/membership fees of $500, $1,000 or $1,500;
- Offered of various levels of training courses, referred to as ‘Stage 1’, ‘Stage 2’ and ‘Stage 3’;
- Offered of individual one-off share suggestions or ‘tips’ for a fee; and
- Offered of access to a private chat site, named ‘Black Wolf Pit’, using online communications platform Discord.
ASIC is sought final and interlocutory orders prohibiting Scholz from:
- Promoting or carrying on providing recommendations or opinions about the purchase of shares in exchange for money or other benefits;
- Promoting or carrying on any financial services business in Australia; and
- Receiving, soliciting, transferring or disposing of customer funds received in connection to providing recommendations or opinions about the purchase of shares.
ASIC noted consumers who received unlicensed advice do not have the same protections afforded to them under the law as when they receive advice from licensed providers.
The matter was listed for a Federal Court hearing on 17 December, 2021.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
