ASIC highlights Macquarie’s advice and record keeping failures

15 August 2014
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

Macquarie Equities Limited (MEL) had "very poor" record keeping and lack of detail in its advice documents, according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

Speaking at a media conference ASIC deputy chairman Peter Kell said the regulator had found examples at MEL's "failure to demonstrate reasonable basis for the advice provided to clients."

"We were concerned about whether there were adequate risk policies and processes and controls in place. We found client files not actually containing the required statement of advice," he said.

The comments come as ASIC announced it will probe into former financial advisers with the Macquarie group MEL and contact 160,000 clients who received advice from Macquarie Private Wealth (MPW) since March 2004, when MEL obtained its Australian financial services licence, about the possible provision of remediation for poor financial advice.

Kell said Macquarie had initially targeted "priority" clients, who might have had problematic advisers, but ASIC had broadened this to include 160,000 clients over the ten years.

However he refused to divulge how many violation reports had been recorded, how many MPW advisers or former advisers are under investigation and how many advisers have lost their jobs due to the enforceable undertaking (EU).

Asked why remediation was not provided during the first stage of the EU, Kell said it took time to investigate who should be covered under the remediation, pinpoint the problematic areas of advice, and the effect on clients. He added they needed to work out if there were particular financial advisers whose clients needed to be given greater priority.

Under the compensation process, clients can request an initial assessment of the advice they got, which will be carried out by a Macquarie advice review committee.

Clients can also ask for an independent assessment of the committee's decision and will be given $5000 to cover those costs.

If they are still unsatisfied they can bring it up with the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), which will waive its usual time or monetary claims limits for this case.

If the EU is not effective, ASIC has the ability to imposing conditions on Macquaries Australian Financial Services licence with Kell stating ASIC was prepared to go to court to enforce the EU.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Ralph

How did the licensee not check this - they should be held to task over it. Obviously they are not making sure their sta...

1 day 19 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Faking exams and falsifying results..... Too stupid to comment on JG...

1 day 20 hours ago
PETER JOHNSTON- AIOFP

Must agree to disagree with you on this one Keith, with the Banks/Institutions largely out of advice now is the time to ...

1 day 20 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 3 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND