ASIC drops charges against two former LM heads

22 September 2016
| By Oksana Patron |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has dropped charges against two former directors of the collapsed Gold Coast-based fund manager, LM Investment Management (LMIM), Simon Tickner and Lisa Darcy, while proceedings continued against Pater Drake, Maree Mulder and Eghard van der Hoven.

ASIC launched its civil penalty proceedings against former fund manager directors in 2014, seeking financial penalties and banning orders as well as the disqualification of Drake and former directors from managing companies and providing financial services.

The claims against Tickner and Darcy were related to their conduct in 2011 as directors in signing off a loan to Maddison Estate, which was at that time owned and controlled by Drake, while the proceedings against other directors focused on both 2011 transaction and another transaction that occurred in 2012.

According to ASIC, Drake had used his position to gain an advantage for himself while the other directors breached their duties for failing to "act with the proper degree of care and diligence" regarding transactions involving the LM managed performance fund (MPF), which had loaned funds to Maddison Estate.

Between 2008 and 2012, several loans using MPF funds helped increase Maddison's total loan limit from $40 million to $280 million, which included the loan extension from $115 million to $180 million in 2011 and from $180 million to $280 million in 2012.

Additionally, by the time LMIM entered into administration, no construction work had commenced on the development and none of the proposed housing lots had been sold, although a development approval had been procured and come preliminary land clearing had taken place.

LMIM was the responsible entity for seven registered managed investment schemes and the trustee of MPF, unregistered managed investment scheme with about 4,500 investors. More than $400 million was invested in MPF and LMIM was responsible for managing at least $800 million.

On 12 September, ASIC discontinued its claim against directors in relation to the 2011 transaction but the proceeding related to the 2012 transaction continues against Drake, Mulder and van der Hoven and has been adjourned until 23 September.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

JOHN GILLIES

Might be a bit different to i the past where at most there was one man from the industry on the loaded enquiry boards a...

17 hours 51 minutes ago
Simon

Who get's the $10M? Where does the money go?? Might it end up in the CSLR to financially assist duped investors??? ...

5 days 12 hours ago
Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 5 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND