ASIC asks research houses to manage conflicts

research-houses/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/research-and-ratings/chairman/financial-advisers/financial-planning-industry/

16 November 2011
| By Chris Kennedy |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has released a research paper proposing research report providers, including research houses, separate their business units in order to manage conflicts of interest and improve confidence in the independence and quality of research reports.

This would involve strict physical and electronic separation between units such as the consulting and funds management services and the research business, ASIC stated.

ASIC is seeking feedback on whether conflicts of interest such as report providers accepting payments from product issuers can be effectively managed, or whether they should be avoided altogether.

ASIC is also proposing research houses lodge a biennial report addressing research methodology and processes, internal conflicts management procedures, conflicts disclosure to users, and managing research quality and transparency.

Consultation Paper 171, Strengthening the regulation of research report providers (including research houses) (CP 171), follows conversations ASIC had with financial planning industry associations and their members. 

These conversations addressed the issues of real or perceived conflicts of interest arising from research houses' revenue models, the adequacy of skills and experience of research analysts in producing quality research, and the lack of transparency and comparability for research methodology.

There was also a disparity in the expected role of research houses between the financial advice firms and researchers themselves. Financial advisers thought research houses should cover less products in more depth, while some research houses saw it as their role to provide coverage for a range of products in each market segment, ASIC stated.

ASIC chairman Greg Medcraft said research report providers are a significant gatekeeper and can influence which products financial advisers recommend, and it is expected they adhere to high standards of conduct.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 17 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo