ASIC admits to Storm Financial complaints

ASIC/storm-financial/disclosure/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/chairman/

26 February 2009
| By Lucinda Beaman |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has admitted in a parliamentary hearing that it received four complaints relating to Storm Financial between 2006 and 2007.

Nationals Senator for New South Wales John Williams said ASIC yesterday admitted it investigated Storm over what it called ‘minor complaints’ but did not consider the group a ‘smoking gun’.

The admission was made during discussions at the Senate Standing Committee on Economics, which included ASIC chairman Tony D’Aloisio and the Minister for Superannuation and Corporate Law, Senator Nick Sherry.

In ASIC's statement to the committee, D'Aloisio said the regulator is "now in the process of reviewing its contacts with Storm and complaints to ASIC about Storm".

"What we can say at this stage is that, prior to 2006, there were a number of communications between ASIC, Storm and its officers based on routine ASIC surveillance in Queensland of financial planners," the ASIC statement said.

But ASIC said any issues raised during the surveillance activities, "generally about disclosure issues", were resolved at the time.

"During 2006-07 ASIC received four complaints about Storm in relation to its Statements of Advice and fee levels," the statement said.

But ASIC argued that none of these complaints were from Storm clients and that the issues did not involve "any examination of Storm's advisory model or use of aggressive leverage".

Instead, the issues concerned disclosure and fees, ASIC said, and were "addressed by Storm at the time".

ASIC said it then received a "number of complaints" from investors on October 31, 2008, which it then reviewed and followed up with various enquiries.

It was in October last year that Challenger, one of the groups associated with Storm, began selling down stocks of Storm Financial clients facing margin calls.

In the hearing, Senator Williams queried why Storm Financial investors with margin loans spiralling into negative equity were “not alerted at a point where they may have been able to manage their debt, rather than being told by the banks their shares had been sold and they still faced a large debt”.

ASIC said responsibility for monitoring the portfolio lay with the investor, Storm Financial and the banks involved.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 9 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo