ASIC action challenged

financial-services-group/financial-planning-services/financial-services-industry/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/administrative-appeals-tribunal/

24 September 2007
| By Mike Taylor |

The Australian Financial Services Group (AFS) has vowed to support a Sydney financial planner, Michael Parker, in an Administrative Appeals Tribunal appeal against a banning order imposed by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

AFS has expressed disappointment at the process followed by ASIC and has claimed the penalty imposed on Parker is disproportionate.

AFS has predicated its support for Parker on the basis that no client suffered loss as a result of Parker’s actions and that, indeed, some clients may have benefited from lower costs.

In a statement issued late last week, AFS said it acknowledged and supported the need for a robust and strong industry and the role of the regulator in achieving this outcome, but was disappointed by the decision to place a banning order on Parker.

ASIC banned Parker, of Sydney suburb Castle Hill, from working in the financial services industry for two years.

Parker was an authorised representative of AFS and provided financial planning services through Associated Professional Advisers Pty Ltd. Parker worked for Associated Professional Advisers, based in Hornsby, NSW, from July 3, 2006.

Parker was banned after an ASIC investigation found that towards the end of September 2006 he sent 90 clients an identical Statement of Advice recommending the rollover of their superannuation savings to a fund in which AFS Limited had a financial interest.

The regulator found that Parker did so without first determining and making enquiries in relation to each client’s personal circumstances or considering whether his advice to each client was appropriate.

The AFS statement said that it believed that no client had suffered loss and that some clients would have benefited from lower costs.

“AFS also understands that the appeal will question ASIC’s assertion that Parker did not first make enquiries in relation to client’s personal circumstances or consider whether the advice to each client was appropriate.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

6 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

6 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

8 months ago

The RBA has handed down its much-anticipated rate decision, following widespread expectations of a close call....

3 weeks 5 days ago

Despite the financial adviser exam being rooted in ethics, two professional year advisers believe the lack of support and transparency from the regulator around the exam ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

Australian retirees could increase their projected annual incomes by as much as 51 per cent through comprehensive financial advice, according to a Vanguard study, but cos...

2 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
88.01 3 y p.a(%)
3