ASFA brands APRA alarmist

APRA superannuation funds executive general manager trustee risk management chief executive

30 August 2002
| By Lachlan Gilbert |

TheAssociation of Superannuation Funds of Australia’s(ASFA) chief executive Philippa Smith says theAustralian Prudential Regulation Authority’s(APRA) claims recently that five large super funds under its charge experienced payment failures are exaggerated.

Smith was responding to a speech given by APRA’s executive general manager of policy, research and consulting, Charles Littrell to ASFA’s New South Wales Chapter in Sydney yesterday.

Littrell told the Chapter that large superannuation funds are just as likely as small funds to experience prudential problems and subsequent APRA involvement.

“A myth has sprung up that superannuation risk is concentrated in small funds. This is regrettably not the case…Just in the last few weeks, for example, we have asked an approved trustee to hand in its licence, and we may make the same request to another approved trustee shortly,” Littrell said.

He added that APRA came close to litigating against a corporate super fund before the fund decided to address APRA’s concerns.

Littrell also said that problems with large super funds that have caught the attention of the regulator included those that had involved fraud, and significantly, these were in multi-billion dollar funds. But so far, these have not resulted in losses to members or adverse publicity. However, he could not guarantee that this record could be maintained in the future.

“It would not be unusual for APRA to have at any one time about 20 funds with more than $10 million in assets rated high or extreme risk,” he said.

Philippa Smith’s reply to these claims is to say that APRA is exaggerating the severity of the cases.

“If our understanding is correct, the corporate fund involved at least $600 million, but related to a defined benefit funding issue. At no time was there any suggestion that any capital was at risk,” Smith says.

And as for the trustees urged to hand in its license, Smith took a swipe at APRA’s slowness to deal with it as it was notified to the regulator’s attention more than a year ago.

“We welcome APRA’s commitment to be more proactive and focus on the four themes identified, but there seems to be some rewriting of history and exaggeration as to the extent of the problem. Some alarmist reporting has resulted,” she says.

The four themes Smith refers to as what Littrell had referred to in his speech as special areas of focus for the regulator are risk management, investment management, outsourcing and excluding unfit and improper people from responsible positions on a super fund.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Chris Cornish

A tad optimistic from Morningstar. Adviser numbers are somewhat irrelevant; it all comes down to the platform and whethe...

3 hours 21 minutes ago
Bob Duruncle

Closing MLC Wrap and forcing clients into an inferior platform was not a good start. In 2024 it's amazing that their new...

5 hours 35 minutes ago
John Hall

How about, like everywhere else in the world, we let PI insurers deal with events like this, rather than having financia...

19 hours ago

A former financial adviser has been banned by ASIC from providing financial services for inappropriate advice, among multiple breaches....

1 week 1 day ago

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has handed down his third budget, outlining the government’s macroeconomic forecasts and changes to superannuation....

2 weeks 1 day ago

Iress has announced it is strengthening its security settings after suffering an unauthorised access of its systems over the weekend....

2 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND