APRA urges continuing bipartisanship on regulation

25 March 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has signaled the need for continuing bipartisan support for the operation of Australia's financial services regulatory system, particularly at times when the regulators are required to take unpopular supervisory actions.

The signal has been sent by APRA executive general manager, Charles Littrell, who used an address to a Macquarie University event to say the regulators needed "moral support from government to take necessary but unpopular supervisory actions".

"My experience is that essentially all the prudential regulators in developed economies have at least reasonable budgets, and on paper they all have strong statutory powers. The essential differences in outcomes, however, tend to stem from the support or lack thereof that governments give regulators for proactive supervision," he said.

Littrell said that in Australia, for a very long time in banking and over the past decade in superannuation and insurance, there had been a strong bipartisan consensus that the financial system should be safe as well as dynamic.

"APRA has for many years felt confident that the Government and Parliament more generally support us, as we undertake our sceptical, intrusive, and where necessary aggressive supervision," he said.

Littrell said this was consistent with the approach seen in most of Asia, Canada, and the Nordic countries.

"It is less obvious in the United States and in some European countries. This latter group of countries suffered most from the financial crisis," he said.

Littrell described Treasury as being the critical agency to ensuring "successive generations of ministers understand that responsibility for the prudential regulator carries with it an inevitable level of complaint".

"There is a choice, however: ministers can receive more or less constant low-level grumbling from the financial industry about the alleged conservatism of the prudential regulator. Alternatively,

once a generation they can receive, often on their way out of office, complaints from millions of voters who have had their financial prospects destroyed by overly lax supervision of the financial sector."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Ralph

How did the licensee not check this - they should be held to task over it. Obviously they are not making sure their sta...

1 day 21 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Faking exams and falsifying results..... Too stupid to comment on JG...

1 day 22 hours ago
PETER JOHNSTON- AIOFP

Must agree to disagree with you on this one Keith, with the Banks/Institutions largely out of advice now is the time to ...

1 day 22 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 3 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND