APLs dictating product development

insurance/

6 June 2008
| By Internal |

Rice Warner Actuaries has released a report on trauma insurance criticising excessive insurable amounts and the product’s slavery to authorised product lists.

The Rice Warner Actuaries report states that despite the large number of products in the Australian marketplace, trauma insurance is “effectively a commodity product with very little differentiation other than on price and service”.

“This is driven in part by planners’ increasing reliance on product research ratings as a basis for their recommendations, which means that insurers which offer less than fully featured products often don’t make the dealer group’s recommended list.”

While the number of insured events in trauma products is increasing, the report shows that comparing the premiums of different trauma products reveals a relatively low claims incidence for most events outside the ‘big four’ — cancer, heart attack, stroke and coronary artery surgery.

The report also suggests the creation of an industry standard for definitions of insurable events.

“In the early days, there was a wide variation in definitions, but more recently there has been some convergence. Part of this has been driven by standardised medical tests, which are more powerful than those in use 20 years ago,” the report states.

“With product convergence, it is arguable whether the industry should continue with different forms of wording. It would simplify matters if there were standard industry wording for definitions.”

Rice Warner said that while all 16 companies offering trauma products in the Australian marketplace offer cover of $1 million or more, “it is difficult to see where there is a realistic need for amounts this large”.

The report suggests “insurance up to $100,000 is reasonable”.

“Unfortunately, many sales of trauma insurance are made for excessive sums insured rather than to meet realistic needs.”

Rice Warner’s research confirms that trauma cover is generally more expensive than total and permanent disablement (TPD) cover.

“This has interesting implications for financial planners when clients have limited budgets — should they buy trauma cover for what are generally temporary financial needs resulting from medical events or cheaper TPD cover for circumstances when they are unlikely to earn significant income again?”

Rice Warner said that despite a 20-year life span in Australia, trauma take-up rates remain relatively low.

Currently, almost all sales of trauma products are made through financial advisers, although there are now some products offered directly to the public. Rice Warner believes this is likely to change, with trauma products to be sold without advice in the future.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

4 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

4 months 3 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

6 months 4 weeks ago

Commonwealth Bank has formally dropped to zero advisers following LGT Crestone’s acquisition of its advice arm – some six years on from the Hayne royal commission. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

2 days 7 hours ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

1 week 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
3