Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

AMP rebuts key Royal Commission claims

amp/

4 May 2018
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

AMP has strenuously denied allegations made during the Royal Commission that it is open to being charged with committing a criminal offence over the Clayton Utz Report provided to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

The financial services firm has also denied suggestions at the Royal Commission around the existence of a general rule around fees being switched on for around 90 days after a client became orphaned.

In a submission responding to the issues raised in the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services, AMP said that the Clayton Utz report had been “uncompromisingly direct and comprehensive” and had been the result of multiple employee interviews.

“It can only have been of assistance to ASIC in its investigation, and to Counsel Assisting in preparing cross-examination. It contains serious adverse findings, including a number of inaccurate or misleading statements to ASIC which form the basis of Counsel Assisting’s submission on that topic,” the submission said.

It went on to say that the issues raised by the case study with respect to AMP concerned matters that were almost entirely the subject of an ongoing ASIC investigation which was nearing completion at the time the Royal Commission began.

On the question of the so-called 90-day rule, the submission said: “The 90 day exception and ringfencing were exceptions to the BOLR Policy, generally authorised by the Managing Director or Head of Financial Planning of the relevant Advice Licensee, under a purported exercise of delegated authority”.

The AMP submission then goes on to extensively outline the approach adopted by the AMP board and to justify the actions to it took, stating “there can be no fair criticism of the entire Board’s role in relation to the [Clayton Utz] report.

However, in doing so, the AMP submission pointed to the role of the company’s legal counsel, Brian Salter and said “the extent of the involvement that Mr Salter had in the preparation of the report was surprising to the Board of AMP as it was to Mr Regan.

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

4 days 1 hour ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

4 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

6 days 19 hours ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 1 day ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

1 week 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND