AML/CTF legislation a huge cost burden

Software/financial-planning-association/

11 August 2006
| By Darin Tyson-Chan |

A senior executive of a data warehousing organisation estimates that it will cost major financial institutions up to $100 million to implement systems and procedures to ensure they comply with the proposed Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing (AML/CTF) legislation.

Teradata senior consultant Asia Pacific Mark Taylor said: “The banks here are going to be spending at least anything from $30, $50, right up to $100 million or more. The organisations need to do an awful lot in terms of building enterprise-wide programs from top to bottom. There needs to be significant training put in place so that everybody is aware of what it means and how they can play their part.”

He said Australian financial institutions were currently lagging behind other organisations around the world regarding its AML/CTF structures.

“Last October, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), which is responsible for building all of the anti-money laundering recommendations around the world, did an audit in Australia and we failed pretty dismally in terms of what we had to combat this sort of thing. We were found in many of those recommendations to be 25 to 50 per cent compliant,” Taylor said.

In recognising how much work needed to be done in this country to comply with the impending AML/CTF legislation, executive vice president with Mantas, a company supplying AML software systems, Darren Innes, supported calls from bodies such as the Financial Planning Association for a minimum three-year transition period.

“What’s going to happen in Australia is that four phases are going to have to be implemented at the same time. Financial institutions are going to have to look at their ‘know your customer’ activity, they are going to have to have a look at their transaction monitoring, and then they’re going to have to look at their processes and cultural change and everything that goes on around that,” Innes said.

“This has taken some countries five, six, and seven years to implement the whole project, and Australia is likely to have to do all of it in 18 months,” Innes added.

However, his advice for financial institutions was not to focus on the cost alone, as being implicated in a money laundering exercise is likely to cause greater cost to the company’s reputation than the initial procedural implementation expenses.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 1 week ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

5 days 6 hours ago

The Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision following this week's monetary policy meeting....

2 weeks ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo