All talk little action on remuneration
|
|
Australian financial planners might be talking the talk when it comes to how they bill their clients but that does not translate to walking the walk, according to new research conducted by Wealth Insights.
The Wealth Insights research reveals that while most financial planners are well aware of the media scrutiny being directed towards adviser remuneration and the likelihood of enforced change, the majority of planners are content with their current charging methods and do not anticipate any changes to what they are currently doing.
Asked what changes they anticipated making with respect to their fee structures over the next two years, 64 per cent of the planners surveyed by Wealth Insights said they did not envisage change, while a further 17 per cent indicated they would move to a predetermined fixed dollar amount and 12 per cent indicated they would move to asset-based fees.
Wealth Insights managing director Vanessa McMahon said amid the calls for self-reform of the way in which the planning industry charged for its services, the reality appeared to be that most planners did not envisage making changes in the near future and were content with their charging models. They were either continuing with the models that they had or were already making changes to the way they charged their clients.
She said the research, and associated focus groups, also suggested that a substantial portion of the financial planning industry was still commissions-driven.
“There are definitely people moving to asset-based fee structures but that creates its own problems in circumstances where some people are already arguing that asset-based fee structures are just a way of disguising commissions,” McMahon said.
She said the research indicated that while there had been a good deal of discussion around adviser remuneration and a general understanding that the regulatory environment was likely to change, many planners remained fixed in the commissions environment.
McMahon said the research, when taken together with sentiment being expressed during recent planner focus groups, suggested that the industry might witness an exodus of older planners if commissions were outlawed without significant grandfathering and if planner educational requirements were made more onerous.
“Most people acknowledge that commissions are on their way out, but there are those older advisers who have indicated that when it finally occurs they will be looking to exit the industry,” she said.
“When the phasing out of commissions is taken together with talk of the need for higher educational standards, there are those who say it represents too much change and effort and that they will sell their businesses and exit,” McMahon said.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
The corporate regulator has officially launched its new digital portal for financial services businesses submitting AFSL applications, offering a more “efficient, modern and user-friendly” experience.
Private markets may be the hot topic of the day but two financial advisers have shared the red flags to consider and why advisers shouldn’t be tempted to invest solely in the pursuit of higher returns.
The advice community has reacted to the re-election of the Labor Party for a second term and called on the incoming Minister for Financial Services to take “decisive action” as Stephen Jones retires from politics.
Advice licensee Finchley & Kent has announced a strategic partnership with technology firm Padua Solutions as licensees are encouraged to broaden their tech usage.
