ACCC concerned about NAB bid for AXA AP
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has indicated it has greater concerns about the National Australia Bank’s (NAB’s) acquisition of AXA Asia Pacific than it did about the bid by AMP Limited.
The ACCC’s preliminary assessment will give heart to AMP’s ambitions with respect to AXA Asia Pacific.
In a preliminary assessment issued yesterday, the ACCC said it believed the NAB acquisition would have a greater impact on competition in the platform market.
“The ACCC’s preliminary view is that the proposed acquisitions may raise competition concerns in the national market for the supply of retail investment platform services to institutions, suppliers of investment products, non-aligned dealer groups and financial adviser businesses,” it said.
“It appears to the ACCC that NAB’s proposed acquisition of AXA raises a higher level of concern than AMP’s proposed acquisition of AXA.”
The regulator said the proposed acquisitions would result in increased concentration in the national market for the supply of retail investment platforms, and added: “the ACCC notes that an acquisition of AXA by NAB will result in an increased level of concentration in respect to the wrap platform segment of the market”.
The competition regulator has called for further submissions on the NAB bid and is expected to hand down a final decision in mid-March.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
