30 per cent of institutions require APRA oversight

APRA/australian-prudential-regulation-authority/chairman/risk-management/

11 August 2006
| By Mike Taylor |

The chairman of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, John Laker, has revealed that as many as 30 per cent of the financial institutions supervised by APRA have some element of their operations requiring higher than normal examination.

In a speech delivered to company directors in Adelaide in early August, Laker said that while 70 per cent of institutions fell into the “normal” category requiring no action on the part of the regulator, most of the remainder fell into the “oversight” category — meaning they “had some aspect of their risk position or operations — such as minor but persistent weaknesses in the control framework or insufficient capital — that requires more extensive examination”.

He said that only a very small percentage of institutions being overseen by APRA fell into the categories worse than “oversight” — “mandated improvement” and “restructure”.

“‘Mandated improvement’ institutions are operating outside APRA’s acceptable bounds for prudent risk management,” Laker said. “These institutions must have a sensible remediation plan and they may be subject to more intense supervisory attention via formal directions or enforceable undertakings, although APRA’s persuasive powers and a cooperative response are often sufficient.

“Institutions in ‘restructure’ are no longer viable in their current form and need some combination of new management, new ownership or new capital, or a new business arrangement,” he said. “As you would expect, these institutions are subject to vigorous supervisory intervention.”

Laker said that currently, around 70 per cent of APRA’s risk-rated institutions were in the “normal” category and almost all the remainder were in “oversight”, with only a small percentage in the “mandated improvement” or “restructure” categories.

“Ideally, APRA would like to see institutions in the ‘normal’ and ‘oversight’ categories improving, or at least not deteriorating, and institutions in the ‘mandated improvement’ and ‘restructure’ categories transitioning to those other categories or exiting the industry, preferably without loss to beneficiaries.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 22 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo