10% of advice of significant concern to ASIC

australian-securities-and-investments-commission/amp/ANZ/commonwealth-bank/national-australia-bank/westpac/regulation/financial-planning/

25 January 2018
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Ten per cent of advice files sampled by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) as part of its focus on the four big banks and AMP Limited gave rise to significant concerns about the impact of non-compliant advice on the customer’s financial situation.

The ASIC report resulting from the scrutiny of AM, ANZ, the Commonwealth Bank, National Australia Bank and Westpac pulls no punches with respect to the regulator’s ongoing concerns about the quality of advice, particularly with respect to superannuation switching.

Explaining its approach, ASIC said it had focused on both the make-up of approved product lists (APLs) within the major institutions and the quality of advice.

Discussing the 10 per cent of advice files about which it had significant concerns, ASIC said this was because clients had often been left worse off.

“We were significantly concerned because, for these customers, switching to the new superannuation platform resulted in inferior insurance arrangements and/or a significant increase in ongoing product fees—without additional benefits being identified that were consistent with the customer’s relevant circumstances,” the report said.

The report also noted that ASIC had found that in 75 per cent of the customer files it reviewed, including the 10 per cent about which it was greatly concerned, “the adviser had not demonstrated compliance with the best interests duty and related obligations”.

However, the regulator acknowledged that outside of the 10 per cent of files which were of significant concern, the remaining outcomes would not have necessarily left clients worse off.

ASIC said there were two areas, in particular, that led to a customer file being rated as not having demonstrated compliance with the best interests duty and related obligations—"that is, where the adviser had not demonstrated that they had:

(a) sufficiently researched and considered the customer’s existing financial

products; and/or

(b) based all judgements on the customer’s relevant circumstances.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

2 months 4 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

3 months 3 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

3 months 4 weeks ago

Advice firms are increasing their base salaries by as much as $50k to attract talent, particularly seeking advisers with a portable book of clients, but equity offerings ...

2 weeks 1 day ago

Ahead of the 1 January 2026 education deadline for advisers, ASIC has issued its ‘final warning’ to the industry, reporting that more than 2,300 relevant providers could ...

4 days 22 hours ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has implored advisers to reevaluate their exposure to AML/CTF obligations ahead of new reforms that will expand their complianc...

3 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo