New data points to homeless or exiting advisers

While 336 new financial planning licensee entities have been created over the past 12 months, 118 licensees have been discontinued affecting 2,000 advisers, two-thirds of whom have yet to find a new home or may have exited the industry.

That it is bottom line of the latest data issued by Adviser Ratings who said the 18 discontinued licensees represented a total of 2,172 advisers or around 10 per cent of the total advice community.

“Nearly two-thirds of these advisers are yet to be re-licensed,” it said. “Of the 2,172 advisers effected, 1,392 are still not advising, inviting speculation that many of these advisers have left the industry for good.”

Related News:

The implications of the data were made clear by Adviser Ratings when it said that the median time for an adviser to be unlicensed prior to getting back in the industry was, normally, just 37 days and that only 36 per cent of affected advisers had thus far found new homes.

It said that of those advisers who had gone to new homes, the vast majority had gone to privately-owned licensees and that of these advisers, nearly nine out of 10 had joined privately-owned licensees who were not owned or affiliated with the traditional large financial institutions.

 




Recommended for you

Author

Comments

Comments

ASIC will be happy. I wonder if this means they can reduce their fees. Logically there are now less people to supervise.

Stay unlicensed - it is the way forward.

You are right Dark. Accountant lawyers and everyone else can give financial advice without being licensed and charge a fee. Now that commissions and payments from product providers are being banned and we are going to fee for service, why would anyone want all the extra cost and hassle and compliance of maintaining a pointless Financial Services License?

Anon, perhaps many will think I am mad a saying the way ahead is to be unlicensed but when there is no incentive to recommend any product, loads of liability in recommending any product other then an Industry Fund, and a demand from clients for advice, it is easy to see that the huge cost and liability of compliance is simply best left alone. Leave product recommendations to the "Planners" at Industry Fund land to make "unbiased", "non-conflicted" "in the best interest of the client" product recommendations. All done for a very nice salary in the best interests of members of course. If/when the over inflated prices of the unlisted assets within the Industry Funds becomes a problem, all point the lawyers to Ms Chester of APRA and now ASIC.

Add new comment