Clicky

Megatrends shaping the advice industry

From increased regulatory scrutiny, to downward pressure on costs and rapidly changing client demands, there is no doubt that today’s financial advisers are facing headwinds from all directions. 

I recently presented at the Financial Services Managed Accounts Forum in Melbourne, examining some of these megatrends, which are not only shaping the current environment but are set to change the way advisers do business forever.

Today’s advisers are facing pressure to charge less for their services, while also seeing the cost of regulation and compliance impacting on their bottom lines. Competition is also on the rise, as robo-advisers challenge traditional advice models.

Related News:

Further, despite the growing demand for financial advice, the industry has been unsuccessful in arresting the decline in client numbers of the past decade, with data from Investment Trends showing advisers are losing three clients for every two they gain.

A focus on client service

What we are seeing is many forward-thinking financial advice firms are already adapting their business models to this changing environment, moving beyond traditional investment advice to assist clients with a broader range of financial needs.

A key part of onboarding and retaining accumulators and pre-retirees is understanding what drives them. Research from PwC shows that the top unmet advice needs of everyday Australians centre on retirement planning and budgeting.                                    

Half of clients are worried about having enough to pay for unexpected expenses, and 42 per cent say it is hard to cover monthly expenses, regardless of their income levels. Therefore, significant opportunities exist for advice providers who can effectively meet these needs.

There is also increasing recognition that the dominant model of the advice industry does not match the preferences of ordinary Australians. Research shows only eight per cent of clients require a full face-to-face comprehensive advice model, while 30 per cent prefer a piece-by-piece model and a huge 77 per cent are willing to transition to a face-to-face model as their needs change.

Globally, there is also a fair amount of work happening to assist financial advisers with the challenge of retaining clients in the face of increased market volatility and scepticism around returns.

In his book Thinking, Fast and Slow, Nobel Prize-winning economist Daniel Kahneman analysed the destruction in portfolio values of clients disengaging when the market goes down and then reengaging when markets recover.

His solution was to design two portfolios, one risky and one safer, based on the ‘regret propensity’ of each investor. Generally, one of the portfolios is always doing better than the market, which means investors are less likely to panic or change their minds when something does go wrong.

This research highlights the need for an adviser not just as a source of investment advice but as a coach and mentor to help clients stay the course in uncertain times.

Increased automation – moving in to Managed Accounts

Another key way successful advice practices are adapting is by incorporating new technologies into their businesses.

While robo-advisers and new entrants such as online budgeting tools continue to challenge the financial advice industry, what is clear is that automated advice will never entirely replace the need for professional input. As such, future financial advice models will marry the best of digital and human.

In the US, we are seeing the emergence of ‘model marketplaces’ – investment menus with in-built investment advisers, who can provide guidance on the most appropriate investment choice for an individual.

In Australia, with increased scrutiny and regulatory requirements being placed on advice firms, we have seen increased focus on solutions that can minimise the administration and compliance burden, freeing up more time to focus on client service and build much-needed scale.

The use of managed accounts in Australia has therefore been rising at a rapid pace. As at 31 December 2017, managed accounts held a total of $57.05 billion in funds under management (FUM), up by an impressive 18.9 per cent in the six months from 30 June 2017.

According to research from Investment Trends, financial advisers who use managed accounts spend significantly less time and effort on administrative tasks, compliance requirements and preparing Statements of Advice, gaining an extra 12.4 hours per week.

The fact that managed accounts can be used for the average investor, rather than those who just have high account balances, will make advice more accessible and attractive to a wider range of clients across the wealth spectrum.

Financial advice firms are currently facing a number of pressures which are forcing them to modify business practices for sustained growth. What is clear is that the businesses that survive will be the ones who can attract and retain younger clients, utilising new technologies and investment models to service them in the most efficient way.

Arnie Selvarajah is Chief Executive Officer of Bell Direct. 




Related Content

Removal of volume-based adviser fees will test super funds

Intra-fund advice will likely fall short of what people need to plan for their retirement and this situation may be made more problematic if a future ...Read more

Advisers must remember to register before FASEA takes effect

Authorised advisers need to make sure they’re on the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC’s) Financial Advisers Register by ...Read more

NAB insists fees for no service a “process issue”

The National Australia Bank (NAB) chief executive, Andrew Thorburn, has defended some fees for no service charged by the bank as a “process issue”...Read more

Author

Comments

Comments

Excellent analysis and clearly shows the important role that professional independent financial advisors can do with their clients. The less on form filling and more on advice giving the better.

In the past financial advisors seem to be more like product salespeople for financial product firms and not advisors for clients. This is not completely true but that was the impression in the minds of the general public. The Royal Commission and Productivity Commission have shown the scant regard some parts of the financial advice industry for their clients but shown considerable attention to their own pockets.

Add new comment