Complaints represent a call to action for financial planners
Financial planning companies and individual planners have been the subject of severe adverse findings by Financial Ombudsman Service panelists.
When the global financial crisis first hit Australia and investment returns headed south, it was predicted in Money Management that there would be an upturn in complaints against financial planners.
Recent adjudications by the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) are a fulfillment of that prediction. Financial planning companies and individual planners have been the subject of severe adverse findings by FOS panelists, with the compensatory impacts nudging right up against the maximum $100,000.
Given the generally adverse publicity to which financial planners have been subjected to in recent months, it is just as well that the adjudications of the FOS are not widely published, because a number of panelists have been scathing in their assessment of how some planners have treated their clients.
However, the recent FOS adjudications should not be interpreted as providing cause for further harsh legislative or regulatory remedies.
Rather, they are proof that the existing system is working, albeit that there has been an upturn in the number of complaints.
Indeed, the upturn in the number of complaints should surprise no-one. Clients rarely find fault with their advisers when markets are rising and investment returns remain in positive territory.
While there are those who have sought to interpret precedents from some of the recent FOS adjudications, they are reaching.
At best, the recent FOS adjudications have simply reflected a proportionate exercise of the body’s powers. Nothing more, nothing less.
New ground will be broken if and when an aggrieved client decides to pursue action against a financial planner or a financial planning company in the law courts — something they are perfectly entitled to do and something which, if successful, would open the way for full compensatory damages.
While there has been much focus on ‘class actions’ with respect to the collapse of Storm Financial and the collapse of managed investment schemes, we have yet to witness the prosecution of a case in the jurisdiction offered by the state supreme courts or the Federal Court.
Dealer group heads, those running financial planning practices and individual financial planners would do well to log on to the FOS website and read the adjudications covering financial planning.
The future of the industry resides in the hands of planners themselves and how they choose to conduct themselves.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
In this week’s episode of Relative Return Insider, hosts Maja Garaca Djurdjevic and Keith Ford take a look at the Reserve Bank’s latest rate cut call, the factors influencing the unanimous decision, and what economists expect from the rest of the year.
In this episode of Relative Return Insider, host Keith Ford is joined by Accountants Daily journalist Imogen Wilson to take a look at why there has been such broad support for a more comprehensive tax reform discussion at the Treasurer’s economic roundtable.
In this week’s episode of Relative Return Insider, AMP chief economist Shane Oliver joins the show to discuss Australia’s stagnating productivity ahead of the government’s economic reform roundtable, and how picking all the “low-hanging fruit” for reform in the ’90s helped kick off a surge that has since stalled out.
In this episode of Relative Return Insider, host Keith Ford is joined by Cyber Daily deputy editor David Hollingworth to take you inside the evolving landscape of cyber crime, how even huge companies can be at risk of breaches, and what that means for anyone trying to understand the risks.
