2019 will be a change year for financial services

The financial services industry should brace itself for 2019 being a year of further significant change.

Why? Because if the Government is not forced to the polls earlier, the next Federal Election will be held in either April or May and because the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry will be a major election issue.

It is now certain that the Royal Commission will remain on the front pages of newspapers right up until early December and probably beyond, with the Commission having allocated the two weeks between 19 November and 30 November for a seventh round of public hearings which will “focus on policy questions arising from the first six rounds”.

Related News:

Why is this important? Because it means that the Royal Commissioner, Kenneth Hayne, will deliver a further round of recommendations flowing from those hearings dealing with policy issues in late February or early March, at a time when the major political parties will be in full election campaign mode.

Make no mistake, the nature of politics resulting from the August events which saw the Liberal Party oust Malcolm Turnbull as Prime Minister and install Scott Morrison are such that the major political parties will enter campaign mode well before the Christmas break and that they will escalate those efforts the moment the Parliament resumes in March.

It is in these circumstances that the Royal Commission’s deliberations must be regarded as handy political ammunition which the parties will seek to use to further their election chances.

Thus, if the earlier hearings of the Royal Commission are to be taken as a guide, the industry should be bracing itself for recommendations which touch upon the rules governing vertical integration within major financial institutions, the shape of Australian Financial Services Licenses (AFSLs) and the governance arrangements around superannuation funds.

Importantly, while counsel assisting the Royal Commission, Michael Hodge QC, has focused on the legality of some conduct of major entities such as AMP Limited, the Commonwealth Bank and MLC, his post-hearing submissions have also pointed to policy issues which may need to be addressed with respect to the activities of industry funds, such as the funding of political advertising (AustralianSuper) and corporate hospitality (HostPlus).

The Royal Commission is this week dealing with the insurance industry and it is likely that policy issues will also arise not only around the relationship between insurers and financial planners but also around the far greater amounts of money involved in the dealings between superannuation funds and group insurers.

It is in the nature of Royal Commissions that Governments are not obligated to act on all of their recommendations, but the level of heat which has been generated by the matters aired at the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry is such that the industry faces changes no matter which side wins the next Federal poll.

It is in such an environment that financial planners and others are likely to find little sympathy on either side of politics when they seek to complain about the challenges presented by the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) regime or the Life Insurance Framework (LIF). Politicians fighting for survival will rarely fight for others.  

Mike Taylor
Managing Editor

Recommended for you




Hi Mike, It is now more than 50 years that ai have been an adviser, 30 years in Australia, and I have followed your writings fervently over a long period. I must congratulate you on being spot on and for being so open minded and unprejudiced.
The RC seems to have let a major sector that should have been covered, off the hook. What has happened to the recovery of benefits for those widows - widowers, orphans and disabled members who lost their insurance benefits when specific funds scooped huge transfers without considering these unadvised or super illiterate members ? What I am referring to are the “no advice” transfers and consolidations.
Now that I am in the twilight years of my advisership, I have had the opportunity of assisting many clients (and some friends and non clients) with their claims. What also amazes me is that on occasion employers sign off an employee as simply leaving service, when in fact they should have held them on the books to assist them through their super and insurance claims. So the employees lose their opportunity to claim. I have had the opportunity of assisting members through this tough time when their benefits would have disappeared in time, without a word from their Employers.
Over the years these member benefits have been buried and lost to them at a time when they and their beneficiaries really needed them.
Going forward, surely Government should take some care and responsibility for this massive pending chasm of illiteracy, now being forced wider by the loss of so many knowledgeable advisers ?

Add new comment