FPA calls for end to product manufacturer exemption

22 March 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The licensing exemption which allows financial product manufacturers to give general advice about their products should be removed because it distorts the market, according to the Financial Planning Association (FPA).

The FPA used a submission to the Productivity Commission review on Competition in the Australian Financial System to argue for an end to the exemption stating that it distorts the market in favour of the product issuers and depletes consumer protections.

“It promotes a sales culture and is counter to and undermines the financial advice best interest duty in the Corporations Act,” the submission said.

It suggested that leaving the exemption in place would serve to undermine the raft of recent reforms including the Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) and the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) regime.

 “The Government has spent the last 8 years bolstering consumer protections around the purchasing of financial products through the introduction of the Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) reforms, the new financial adviser professional standards and ethics regime, and the soon to be introduced product design and distribution legislation and enhanced ASIC regulatory powers.”

At the same time as calling for an end to the product manufacturer exemption, the FPA submission said the organisation supported renaming ‘general advice’ and the requirement that the term ‘advice’ only to be used in association with ‘personal advice’ that takes into consideration personal circumstances.

However, it said it opposed the ‘removal of licensing and regulatory obligations currently associated with some or all forms of general advice’.

It said the intent of renaming ‘general advice’ had to be associated with removing the consumer confusion associated with the term.

“Consumer protection mechanisms must not be watered down - the regulations that currently apply to ‘general advice’ should remain under the new name as they provide vital consumer protection mechanisms,” the FPA submission.

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Avenue 17

I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will communica...

15 hours ago
Robert Segue

Sounds like a schoolyard childish scrap! take it behind the shelter sheds and sort it out! Really Publicly listed compa...

1 day 15 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

iN THE END IT IS THE REGULATORS FAULT. wHILE I WAS WORKING I WAS ALLWAYS AMAZED AT HOW UNTHINKING SOME CLIENTS WERE! I...

1 day 19 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND