Macquarie Bank receives $10m penalty from Federal Court
![image](https://res.cloudinary.com/momentum-media-group-pty-ltd/image/upload/s--XME3wy5X--/c_fill%2Cf_webp%2Cg_center%2Ch_480%2Cw_855/v1/Money%20Management/macquarie-mm_ipsfwl.jpg?itok=cxUPK_4W)
![image](https://res.cloudinary.com/momentum-media-group-pty-ltd/image/upload/s--XME3wy5X--/c_fill%2Cf_webp%2Cg_center%2Ch_480%2Cw_855/v1/Money%20Management/macquarie-mm_ipsfwl.jpg?itok=cxUPK_4W)
ASIC has announced that the Federal Court has ordered Macquarie Bank to pay a penalty of $10 million for failing to have effective controls to prevent and detect unauthorised fee transactions conducted by third parties such as financial advisers.
This applied on customer cash management accounts using Macquarie’s bulk transacting facility.
The decision comes after a case in which a financial adviser fraudulently withdrew almost $3 million from his clients’ Macquarie cash accounts.
“Fraud controls are increasingly important and this case sends an important message to financial institutions and other financial service licensees that they must have appropriate controls in place,” said ASIC chair Joe Longo.
“While Macquarie implemented effective controls from January 2020, its earlier failures meant that financial adviser Ross Hopkins was able to fraudulently withdraw around $2.9 million from his customers’ accounts without being detected by Macquarie.
“ASIC expects financial institutions to prioritise and invest in systems that protect their customers. Macquarie fell short of its obligation to do all things necessary to provide its financial services efficiently, honestly and fairly and as a result it has become liable for a substantial penalty.”
The regulator said that Macquarie enabled its customers to give third parties, such as financial advisers, stockbrokers and accountants, different levels of authority to transact on their accounts, including a limited authority to withdraw the third party’s fees.
Macquarie also made available to third parties a bulk transacting tool to make multiple withdrawals across multiple customer accounts simultaneously.
Between 1 May 2016 and 15 January 2020, Macquarie failed to implement effective controls to monitor whether third party bulk transactions under the fee authority were actually for fees.
While Macquarie initially defended the proceeding, it later admitted that it contravened its obligation to provide its financial services efficiently, honestly and fairly.
Macquarie agreed to pay a penalty of $10 million for its conduct.
Between October 2016 and October 2019, Hopkins made 167 unauthorised transactions on 13 of his clients’ cash management accounts via Macquarie’s bulk transaction system, totalling $2.9 million.
Macquarie admitted that it failed to do all things necessary between October 2016 and 15 January 2020 to ensure that the financial services covered by its financial services licence were provided efficiently, honestly and fairly by failing to implement effective controls to prevent or detect transactions conducted by third parties through its bulk transacting system that were outside the scope of the fee authority conferred on them, including those carried out by Hopkins.
Hopkins was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment after an investigation and referral of a prosecution brief from ASIC and has also been permanently banned from providing financial services or from controlling an entity carrying on a financial services business.
Recommended for you
A NSW-based adviser has been banned from providing financial services for five years for inappropriate advice and the AFSL of his business has been cancelled by ASIC.
The introduction of Rhombus Advisory has caused a shift in the top advice licensees as Insignia separates its advice business into two channels.
Given the clear divergence between the cost of financial advice and clients’ willingness to pay, two experts explore how advisers can transform the way they convey value to potential clients.
Nearly 18 months since Invest Blue adopted its nine-day fortnight structure to support employee wellbeing, the national advice firm has enjoyed positive results across all metrics.
Who get's the $10M? Where does the money go?? Might it end up in the CSLR to financially assist duped investors???
iN THE END IT IS THE REGULATORS FAULT.
wHILE I WAS WORKING I WAS ALLWAYS AMAZED AT HOW UNTHINKING SOME CLIENTS WERE! If they were clever enough to put to gether those sorts of lump sums WHY DO THEY NEED SOME DILL TO MAKE MANUAL CHANGES FOR THEM? JG
Add new comment