Superannuation industry at odds over SuperStream costs
The Self-Managed Super Fund Professionals' Association (SPAA) has hit back at calls for self-managed super fund (SMSF) members to pay more towards the SuperStream levy, saying they already pay enough.
Last week the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) called on the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to include SMSFs in the levy, saying that if they were not included superannuation funds would be at a disadvantage.
SPAA chief executive Andrea Slattery said if SMSFs were to pay an extra $38,000 in levies to help cover the cost of SuperStream, each member would be paying $40 on average towards the cost of the initiative.
She said superannuation funds would pay less than $5 per member, while the SMSF levy was recently raised by $20 per SMSF, collecting $9.4 million, which SPAA assumed was to cover the cost of SuperStream.
"The figures clearly suggest SMSF members are, on average, already contributing more towards the cost of SuperStream than members of Australian Prudential Regulation Authority-regulated funds," she said.
ASFA said ASIC's estimate of the cost per superannuation member as a result of the levy at $4 was grossly under-estimated.
But Slattery said it was illogical for SMSF members to pay more because they have a higher balance when they would not incur more costs for the Australian Taxation Office.
"In fact the opposite might well be the case, as APRA funds are more likely to have higher volumes of contributions and other transactions," she said.
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Recommended for you
With just 30 per cent of Australians knowing their superannuation balance to the nearest $1,000, Findex has emphasised the role of financial advice in addressing the critical super knowledge gap.
Underestimating the cost of insurance by almost $75,000 in a Statement of Advice is among multiple reasons that a relevant provider has faced action from the FSCP.
Financial Services Council chief executive, Blake Briggs, is urging Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, to take advantage of the QAR opportunity to reduce regulatory duplication and ensure advice is affordable.
Former chair of the House of Representatives’ Standing Economics Committee, Tim Wilson, is planning a return to politics after losing his seat in the 2022 federal election.
