PC report shows SMSFs should pay attention to fees, costs

PC/productivity-commission/SMSFs/

30 May 2018
| By Nicholas Grove |
image
image image
expand image

The Productivity Commission’s (PC’s) draft report into super is a “timely reminder” to self-managed super fund (SMSF) trustees to pay close attention to the fees and costs their funds incur, in order to ensure their funds are optimising their retirement savings, the SMSF Association said.

SMSF Association CEO John Maroney said the report has a clear message for SMSFs about the negative impact of fees and costs on their retirement incomes, and as such “it’s a critical issue demanding the close attention of trustees and their advisers”.

“With the commission finding that lower balance SMSFs have higher costs than their counterparts, it is important that trustees understand and manage their SMSF in the most cost-effective manner while maintaining the quality of the administration and advice they seek,” Maroney said.

“In particular, for SMSF trustees starting off with a lower balance, it is essential that they have a plan to achieve greater scale and cost-effectiveness as quickly as possible.

“To achieve this goal the association strongly recommends that trustees receive specialised SMSF advice from accredited and appropriately qualified professionals to ensure that their fund is fit for purpose and achieves the best outcomes over the long term.”

Maroney said it was pleasing that that the commission found that engagement was highest with those who had an SMSF, highlighting the role SMSFs play in encouraging choice and competition in the superannuation system.

He also welcomed the key findings and recommendations of the report that largely focused on improving the efficiency and performance of the default superannuation system for the millions of Australians who were members of large superannuation funds.

“Proposed reforms such as employees being allocated a default super fund only once, a ‘best in show’ shortlist of large default super funds, preserving choice and competition and significant insurance reforms are worthy ideas that should be considered to improve the competitiveness and efficiency of the superannuation system.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months 1 week ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

1 week 6 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

3 weeks 2 days ago

ASIC has confirmed the industry funding levy for the 2024–25 financial year, and how much licensees can expect to pay....

3 days 21 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
5